While Kinvey provides the visual development capability for front-end development, what sets Kinvey apart are its no-code capabilities. This is where traditional low-code platforms excel, but at a cost that professional developers resist. If you ask most developers, they get truly excited when they can focus on delivering cool application functionality, rather than spend time on infrastructure, integration, and setup drudgery. Developer focus on app and business logic Developers are free to use other tools as well, including their preferred CI/CD tools, version control systems, etc.
#Progress kinvey chat code#
This allows other tools such as Visual Studio Code to be used while still maintaining the Kinvey Studio workflow with roundtrip code support between any IDE and Kinvey Studio. While Kinvey Studio visually scaffolds the application, the generated code is completely accessible and clearly labeled where custom code can be placed. Developers are free to use popular frameworks like Angular or Vue along with their IDE of choice. This front-end code is cleanly decoupled from the Node.js back-end, which is deployed as a combination of serverless functions and microservices.
#Progress kinvey chat android#
Kinvey takes a full-stack JavaScript approach that leverages open-source NativeScript for iOS and Android and Kendo UI for web development. With Kinvey, everything is standards-based and completely open. It also doesn’t mean that it is easy to edit or sometimes even access the code that is generated by these platforms. While traditional low-code vendors may support a standard language, that doesn’t mean their application development cycle itself is standard. While there are many differences between our approach and traditional low-code solutions, let’s look at the key distinctions that appeal to professional developers. We also have the enterprise architect in mind, which drives our hosted, cloud-native serverless architecture. While Progress caters to professional developers, we also support every key business application team member including designers, devops, and data scientists. Progress takes a different approach to low-code that aims to avoid these pitfalls. Developers fear that low-code platforms will strip them of control, force them to use unfamiliar proprietary tools, and tie them to aging architectures and hybrid mobile containers. Surveys have shown that professional app developers are skeptical of traditional low-code platforms.